header-logo header-logo

Tax Credits (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/848)

20 March 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Amend multiple tax credit instruments in order to achieve a series of changes to update and clarify the tax credit system.

Commencement date

Partly on 6 April 2012; Fully on 1 May 2012


Legislation Affected

SI 2002/2005, SI 2002/2006, SI 2002/2007, SI 2002/2014, SI 2002/2173, SI 2003/653, SI 2003/654, SI 2003/742 amended

Summary

Alter the qualifying working hours for a couple with children in relation to working tax credit, requiring couples with children to work 24 hours a week between the two of them. One partner must work at least 16 of these.

Reduce the time for backdating and paying claims to a third of their previous levels, from 93 days to 31 days. Halve the period in which someone must notify HMRC about the account into which tax credits should be paid to four weeks. Remove entitlement to the 50+ elements of the working tax credit.

Clarify the position in relation to children with their sixteenth birthday falling

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll