header-logo header-logo

07 September 2015
Issue: 7667 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tax the City?

City law firms should make a financial contribution to legal aid, through a “tax” if need be, according to Geoffrey Bindman QC.

Writing in NLJ this week, Bindman, former leading legal aid solicitor and NLJ columnist, has backed the Lord Chancellor Michael Gove’s proposal that City firms contribute more to legal aid. However, he notes that “efforts to persuade prosperous lawyers to make a major contribution to the funding of legal services have a long history without significant result”.

Bindman argues that City law firms’ main contribution “must be financial” both because existing City pro bono programmes, although “highly commendable”, have “considerable limitations” due to a lack of expertise in the legal area concerned and because charitable efforts by the profession to raise funds for legal services “have not filled the gap”.

He suggests a levy of 10% on incomes over £150,000 which could be paid through a charity and therefore tax deductible.

City firms failed to welcome Gove’s suggestion, in June, that they contribute more. However, most of them already have substantial pro bono programmes and all do pro bono work, some of which is ground-breaking and innovative.

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, for example, became the first City firm to win a Legal Aid Lawyer of the Year (Laly) award this year, jointly with Royal Courts of Justice Advice Bureau, for their development of Courtnav.

Linklaters has commissioned legal education charity Pro Bono Community to provide its lawyers with a bespoke training programme in housing law. The training covers legal advice at clinics, social security law and housing benefits, and common areas of housing law that arise at the advice clinic Linklaters runs in conjunction with the Mary Ward Legal Centre.

The training is part of Linklaters’ involvement in the Collaborative Plan for Pro Bono in the UK, and will be rolled out to in-house counsel and lawyers at other firms.

Issue: 7667 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll