header-logo header-logo

Tax Avoidance Schemes

26 February 2010
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Tax Avoidance Schemes (Information) (Amendment)
(SI 2010/410)

Amend the Tax Avoidance Scheme (Information) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/1864) which prescribe the information to be provided to HMRC when a person is required to notify arrangements under the Finance Act 2004, Pt 7 and the time limits in which that information is to be provided. These Regulations extend the requirement to provide prescribed information to a person who is a party to a disclosed stamp duty land tax (SDLT) avoidance scheme.

Omits regulation 4(5ZA) which has become extraneous, having identical wording to regulation 4(5).

Amends regulation 8 of the 2004 Regulations to prescribe the information that a purchaser must provide and the period within which the purchaser must provide that information.

Regulation 8(17) which disapplied regulation 8 to SDLT is revoked.

 

In force : 1 April 2010

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll