header-logo header-logo

12 November 2025
Issue: 8139 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Abuse
printer mail-detail

Tackling violence through the family court

Violence against women and girls (VAWG) ‘is now a public emergency’, Barbara Mills KC, a family silk and chair of the Bar Council, has warned

However, the family courts system, which plays a crucial role in tackling VAWG and protecting victims, is underfunded and ‘cannot function as it should’, Mills said. She urged the government to remember the role of the family courts as well as the criminal justice system as it finalises its plans to halve VAWG in the next decade—one of its manifesto commitments.

Some 51% of women killed by men in 2022 were killed by a current or former partner or intimate, according to the latest Femicide Census. In its report, ‘Everyday business’, in October, however, the Domestic Abuse Commissioner and Loughborough University published findings that abuse is often minimised by CAFCASS officers and dismissed during judicial decision-making in child arrangement cases.

The Bar Council set out its policy recommendations for VAWG this week in a paper, ‘Tackling violence against women and girls—why family courts are key’. It suggested bringing all cases involving domestic abuse within legal aid scope for both parties, and removing means testing for alleged victims and survivors. It called on the government to fund the rollout of the Pathfinder courts and the Family Drug and Alcohol Courts, improve support for families and continue support for the domestic abuse protection orders and notices pilots.

Mills said the family court system is ‘dilapidated and understaffed... At some courts, victims and alleged perpetrators are forced to sit in the same waiting room; meetings are held in rooms where you can hear what is being discussed next door... a lack of security means lawyers and our clients are in danger… Investment is urgently needed to ensure we have accessible, survivor-centred justice focused on early intervention and prevention’.

Issue: 8139 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Abuse
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll