header-logo header-logo

Tackling SLAPPs

31 October 2025 / Paige Coulter
Issue: 8137 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Defamation , Libel , Media , Human rights
printer mail-detail
234242
New legislation & SRA guidance mark a stronger stance on litigation that stifles perceived critics, writes Paige Coulter
  • SLAPPs appear to be on the rise, or at least are being identified more frequently in the UK.
  • To address them, ss 194 and 195 of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 have come into force, and the Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Bill will go to second reading later this year.
  • The Solicitors Regulation Authority has published further clarification on its approach to ensuring solicitors have acted properly and ethically with regard to SLAPPs.

A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is the term used to describe a legal action taken with the purpose of burdening the defendant with the cost, stress and risk of defending or responding to the SLAPP, typically to dissuade discussion of matters of public interest by intimidating the named defendant(s) and creating a wider chilling effect on public discussion. SLAPPs typically take the form of defamation actions, where a powerful individual or organisation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll