header-logo header-logo

Tackling SLAPPs

31 October 2025 / Paige Coulter
Issue: 8137 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Defamation , Libel , Media , Human rights
printer mail-detail
234242
New legislation & SRA guidance mark a stronger stance on litigation that stifles perceived critics, writes Paige Coulter
  • SLAPPs appear to be on the rise, or at least are being identified more frequently in the UK.
  • To address them, ss 194 and 195 of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 have come into force, and the Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Bill will go to second reading later this year.
  • The Solicitors Regulation Authority has published further clarification on its approach to ensuring solicitors have acted properly and ethically with regard to SLAPPs.

A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is the term used to describe a legal action taken with the purpose of burdening the defendant with the cost, stress and risk of defending or responding to the SLAPP, typically to dissuade discussion of matters of public interest by intimidating the named defendant(s) and creating a wider chilling effect on public discussion. SLAPPs typically take the form of defamation actions, where a powerful individual or organisation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll