header-logo header-logo

24 July 2024
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-detail

TA6 row comes to head as Chancery Lane votes

The TA6 property law controversy resulted in a close call for the Law Society this week, as a vote of confidence took place at Chancery Lane

Property lawyers are disputing the Law Society’s updating a conveyancing form, TA6, in line with National Trading Standards guidance on ‘material information’ (MI). The Property Lawyers Action Group (PLAG) disputes the need for the update on the basis the guidance is not legally binding, and fears the change to the form will result in flawed information being included, which could increase lawyers’ risk of civil liability or even put them at risk of committing a criminal offence.

In June, more than 100 members, organised by the PLAG, instigated a vote of no confidence in the Law Society president, Nick Emmerson, and chief executive, Ian Jeffery, to represent members who practise conveyancing.

It took place at a special general meeting at the Law Society headquarters this week, chaired by deputy vice president Mark Evans. The results were 123 For, 207 Against, with 20 Abstentions. Accordingly, the vote was lost.

Amerdeep Somal, chair of the Law Society Board, and Mark Evans, deputy vice president of the Law Society, said: ‘The Law Society Council and Board fully support the President and CEO and are pleased with the outcome of today’s vote.

‘We have listened to the concerns raised by some of our members on this specific issue. It is important to note that we have already taken steps to address these concerns by postponing the compulsory implementation of the updated TA6 form. We have also launched a consultation to ensure we understand the full range of member views.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll