header-logo header-logo

13 November 2015 / Jennifer Kotilaine
Issue: 7676 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Swings & roundabouts

nlj_7676_kotilaine

The Supreme Court has tackled the definition of ordinary residence, reports Jennifer Kotilaine

R (Cornwall Council) v SSHD & Somerset County Council [2015] UKSC 46, [2015] All ER (D) 91 (Jul), deals with a young man, P, who was born in 1986 in Wiltshire. He has profound physical and learning disabilities and lacks capacity to decide where to live. P was accommodated in 1991 under s 20 of the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989). His foster placement was in South Gloucestershire where he remained until 2004. P’s parents moved from Wiltshire to Cornwall in 1991 and P would occasionally visit his parents there for brief periods during the holidays.

After turning 18, P moved out of his foster placement in South Gloucestershire and into a care home in Somerset where he is now accommodated under s 21 of the National Assistance Act 1948 (NAA 1948). There is no question that he will be accommodated for the rest of his life, such are his needs for care and attention that are not otherwise available to him.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll