header-logo header-logo

Supermarkets face competition test

15 October 2009
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Retailers could face further hurdles before they can open stores after the Competition Commission renewed its recommendations that the government implement a new planning test.

Retailers could face further hurdles before they can open stores after the Competition Commission renewed its recommendations that the government implement a new planning test.

The commission has revised its recommendations for a “competition test”, after a challenge from Tesco earlier this year.

Under revised proposals, retailers will pass the test if they are new to the area, or if four or more different supermarkets are within a 10-minute drive of the proposed site. Where there are three or fewer grocers in the area, the application will go ahead as long as it will operate less than 60% of the groceries sales area.

They will be able to make small extensions to stores, provided they are no more than 300sqm of groceries sales areas and have not been modified in the previous five years.

However, David Greene, partner at Edwin Coe LLP, says the competition test is all about the competition between the big four supermarkets in out of town sites. “It does little or nothing to assist the plight of the convenience stores which continue to struggle against the dominance of the supermarkets,” he adds.

“The competition test is intended to address consumer choice in the out of town shopping malls but that choice is being killed in town by the growing presence and eventual dominance of the big four in the convenience sector.”

Issue: 7389 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll