header-logo header-logo

15 October 2009
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Supermarkets face competition test

Retailers could face further hurdles before they can open stores after the Competition Commission renewed its recommendations that the government implement a new planning test.

Retailers could face further hurdles before they can open stores after the Competition Commission renewed its recommendations that the government implement a new planning test.

The commission has revised its recommendations for a “competition test”, after a challenge from Tesco earlier this year.

Under revised proposals, retailers will pass the test if they are new to the area, or if four or more different supermarkets are within a 10-minute drive of the proposed site. Where there are three or fewer grocers in the area, the application will go ahead as long as it will operate less than 60% of the groceries sales area.

They will be able to make small extensions to stores, provided they are no more than 300sqm of groceries sales areas and have not been modified in the previous five years.

However, David Greene, partner at Edwin Coe LLP, says the competition test is all about the competition between the big four supermarkets in out of town sites. “It does little or nothing to assist the plight of the convenience stores which continue to struggle against the dominance of the supermarkets,” he adds.

“The competition test is intended to address consumer choice in the out of town shopping malls but that choice is being killed in town by the growing presence and eventual dominance of the big four in the convenience sector.”

Issue: 7389 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll