header-logo header-logo

Supermarket wars

15 December 2011 / Hle Blog
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

HLE blogger Deborah L Parry wonders if supermarkets are off their trollies

"Last week, four of the UK’s biggest supermarkets were the focus of a report on supermarket price wars for BBC1’s Panorama, which suggested many of the pricing tactics used by supermarkets could potentially be illegal.

Supermarkets, like all other retailers supplying goods to consumers, have to comply with the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277).

Regulation 5 prevents traders giving false information or information which deceives or is likely to deceive the average consumer about, the price of products or the existence of a specific price advantage and which causes or is likely to cause the average consumer to take a transactional decision they would not otherwise have taken.

Regulation 6 prohibits misleading omissions where material information is omitted, hidden, unclear, unintelligible, ambiguous or untimely and causes an average consumer to take a different transactional decision from that he would otherwise have taken.

To assist in interpreting these very broad and general prohibitions, the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills has issued the Pricing Practices Guide (November 2010).

This guide has no mandatory force and may, in some instances, go beyond what the law requires. It does, however, take into account the requirements of the Regulations and provides guidance for traders ‘on good practice in giving information about prices’. One would hope and expect our leading supermarkets to do their utmost to follow it.

In light of the current supermarket ‘price wars’, there are concerns over the way some products are marketed and the wording used in relation to prices. Asda, for example, in addition to their ‘Rollback’ pricing promotions, also have had items marked, both on the shelves in supermarkets and online, as ‘WOW’ items...”

To continue reading go to: www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk

Issue: 7494 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll