header-logo header-logo

suitable character?

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

In brief

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) wants practitioners’ views on who should be allowed to enter the profession. While the Solicitors Act 1974 and various regulations oblige the SRA to ensure that, before admission, people are of the character and suitability to be a solicitor, there is no definition of character and suitability. Draft guidelines were issued in June 2006 and piloted among the profession. The SRA now wants solicitors’ views on how the guidelines can be improved. They guidelines are available at www.sra.org.uk and the consultation closes on 27 April 2007.

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll