header-logo header-logo

Substance trumps procedure

19 July 2024 / Andrew Young
Issue: 8080 / Categories: Features , Tort , Personal injury , Damages
printer mail-detail
182210
Tort in Spain, claim in England—should interest be awarded at the higher rate as stipulated by Spanish law? Andrew Young reports
  • Covers the Court of Appeal decision in Nicholls v Mapfre, concerning claims brought in England against Spanish insurance company Mapfre for accidents in Spain. Liability was admitted and damages assessed under Spanish law.
  • Addresses question of whether the English court should award interest at the higher rate stipulated by Spanish law (art 20(4) of Spanish Insurance Contract Act 50/1980).
  • The answer might depend on whether the award of interest was substantive (Spanish law) or procedural (either English or Spanish, at the court’s discretion).
  • The Court of Appeal held the interest payable was a matter of substance, so the higher Spanish rate applied.

On 27 June 2024 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in three conjoined appeals (Nicholls v Mapfre Espana Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros SA [2024] EWCA Civ 718, [2024] All ER (D) 28 (Jul)), all of which were brought by the Spanish insurance company

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll