header-logo header-logo

19 July 2024 / Andrew Young
Issue: 8080 / Categories: Features , Tort , Personal injury , Damages
printer mail-detail

Substance trumps procedure

182210
Tort in Spain, claim in England—should interest be awarded at the higher rate as stipulated by Spanish law? Andrew Young reports
  • Covers the Court of Appeal decision in Nicholls v Mapfre, concerning claims brought in England against Spanish insurance company Mapfre for accidents in Spain. Liability was admitted and damages assessed under Spanish law.
  • Addresses question of whether the English court should award interest at the higher rate stipulated by Spanish law (art 20(4) of Spanish Insurance Contract Act 50/1980).
  • The answer might depend on whether the award of interest was substantive (Spanish law) or procedural (either English or Spanish, at the court’s discretion).
  • The Court of Appeal held the interest payable was a matter of substance, so the higher Spanish rate applied.

On 27 June 2024 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in three conjoined appeals (Nicholls v Mapfre Espana Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros SA [2024] EWCA Civ 718, [2024] All ER (D) 28 (Jul)), all of which were brought by the Spanish insurance company

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll