header-logo header-logo

04 February 2021
Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Student legal advice centre offers help to refugees

The University of Derby’s Student Legal Advice Centre has launched a new clinic focusing on the provision of legal advice to refugees.

The Immigration Family Reunion Clinic will assist refugees in Derby, who may not have the funds for legal advice and whose cases are not covered by legal aid, in making applications to bring their families to the UK. Set up in 2019, the student advice centre originally focused on providing family law advice, offering a pro bono service whereby law students advised the community on a range of issues under the supervision of qualified legal professionals. The new clinic has been established in partnership with the British Red Cross and Paragon Law, with students taking instructions from clients prior to Paragon Law assessing whether they would benefit from specialist legal advice.

Kaye Howells, senior lecturer in law and centre lead at the University of Derby, said: ‘The University’s Law School is proud to be partnering with the British Red Cross and Paragon Law to enable the provision of this much-needed service. The launch of the Immigration Family Reunion Clinic would not be possible without such collaboration. I know I speak on behalf of our student volunteers when I say how proud we are to be delivering this service to the public.’

Sophie Spencer, a third-year law student, added: ‘I have loved working in the Student Legal Advice Centre. Not only has it helped me to develop practical legal skills, but it has also helped to improve my emotional intelligence due to dealing with sensitive issues. It is wonderful to know that we can help real clients and provide assistance that they would otherwise not have access to.’

The clinic runs virtually every two weeks on a Wednesday between 1pm and 5pm. An appointment can be booked by emailing the Student Legal Advice Centre or via the British Red Cross in Derby.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll