header-logo header-logo

19 May 2021
Issue: 7933 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Stress driving family lawyers out of profession

One in four family lawyers is on the verge of quitting due to the pressure of work, according to a report on wellbeing in the profession.

The report, ‘Wellbeing in family law’, published this week by family lawyers group Resolution, includes alarming case studies such as that of a Western Circuit barrister who suffered almost total sleep deprivation for three weeks.

More than half of the 1,200 family practitioners surveyed said they have considered quitting in the past three years because of concerns about their wellbeing. At the time of the survey, 26% were actively considering leaving the profession.

The practitioners reported long working hours and heavy workloads while client expectations and the stress of working in isolation during lockdown have stretched them to the limit. Some 57% of practitioners work more than eight extra hours during the week. Almost all (88%) needed to work during annual leave and 64% of practitioners said they usually or always feel fatigued during the working day.

Of those considering leaving, 45% are junior practitioners, which raises the risk of a generational drain of talent. Junior practitioners have also missed out during the pandemic due to reduced opportunities to learn from more experienced lawyers.

While awareness of wellbeing has grown in recent years, 43% of practitioners still felt uncomfortable talking to their employers about work-related stress and pressures.

Juliet Harvey, national chair of Resolution, said: ‘If firms fail to embrace flexible working and better wellbeing support, I fear we could lose the next generation of family practitioners.’

Elizabeth Rimmer, chief executive at LawCare, which supported the research, said: ‘This report is a catalyst for action to start creating everyday habits in family law that support wellbeing, such as good supervision, training for managers, and creating a positive work-life balance.’

View the report at: resolution.org.uk/mywellbeing.

Issue: 7933 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession , Mental health
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll