header-logo header-logo

Streamlining liability

10 December 2009 / James Sharpe , David Hertzell
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

David Hertzell & James Sharpe chart the history & progress of the Third Parties Bill

The Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Bill was introduced in the House of Lords last month. The Bill follows the widely supported recommendations of the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission, published in 2001.

The Bill replaces the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 1930 (and its Northern Ireland equivalent). The 1930 Acts sought to deal with the problem highlighted in Re Harrington Motor Company [1928] Ch 105. The claimant was injured by a car belonging to an insured company.

He won damages, but the company was wound up before he could enforce the judgment. The court ruled that the insurance proceeds were part of the assets of the company, to be distributed among the creditors, denying the victim his full payment.

The 1930 Acts are not just confined to road traffic cases, but apply generally. When an insured is liable to a third party, eg an employee, and the insured becomes insolvent, the Acts transfer the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll