header-logo header-logo

15 February 2007 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Strands of opportunity

How do public authorities’ new duties of non-discrimination fit the broader drive for equality? Charles Pigott explains

Recent amendments to the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) and the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975) create new public sector duties which mirror those introduced in the race relations field in 2001. The new duties under DDA 1995 came into effect on 4 December 2006. Those under SDA 1975 will come into force on 6 April 2007.

Recent months have seen the publication of the Duty to Promote Disability Equality—Statutory Code of Practice and the Gender Equality Duty—Code of Practice for England and Wales and the remaining regulations establishing the precise extent of these duties.

What duties?

The new duties include:
 a general duty to promote equality of opportunity which applies to most public authorities;
 a range of specific duties applying only to named authorities, to reinforce the general duty; and
 an obligation not to discriminate in the performance of public functions, where this is not already covered by existing legislation.
The general duty
The general

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll