header-logo header-logo

A sting in the tail

28 February 2008 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Company , Public , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Michael Salter and Chris Bryden consider the problems left behind by insolvent employers

It is estimated that every day in the 50 companies go out of business. Beyond the initial impact this will have on employees, who are likely to end up losing their jobs, there may also be a secondary sting in the tail when they find that money they are owed will not be as easy to obtain as they first thought.

Not only may this mean that wage payments due and owing are not made, it may also mean that there are difficulties in obtaining redundancy payments. Further, any claims currently pending in the employment tribunal or county court, or potential claims not yet issued, are likely to be affected by the employer’s insolvency. Various legal avenues exist to provide employees of insolvent employers with at least some recompense.

 

INSOLVENCY

The Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) provides that an employee’s claim for remuneration— which includes all wages and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll