header-logo header-logo

08 April 2016 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Features , Insurance surgery , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Still driving dangerously

istock_000075134093_web

How can redress be sought for institutionalised illegality by the Department for Transport, asks Nicholas Bevan

Motor accident victims depend on statutory compensatory guarantees that ensure that they will receive their full entitlement. This is achieved primarily through the imposition of compulsory third party motor cover and this responds to the vast majority of claims. The concept was first introduced in the UK in 1930. It was a pragmatic and common-sense innovation devised to protect injured victims from the vagaries of a wrongdoer’s ability to satisfy the damages.

Part VI of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988) currently defines the scope of the duty to insure and the third party cover this requires. There are also two separate but closely interrelated compensatory schemes devised by the Department for Transport. These are supposed to extend the same compensatory protection to victims of uninsured and untraced drivers. The first of these schemes was introduced in 1946. Both schemes are managed by the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB), whose role is defined by a series of private

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll