header-logo header-logo

Stepping into a foreign judge’s shoes?

24 January 2025 / George Hepburne Scott
Issue: 8101 / Categories: Features , Extradition , Criminal
printer mail-detail
204788
To what extent can an English extradition court take account of the prospect of early release overseas? George Hepburne Scott calls for clarity
  • Recent High Court extradition appeal decisions have considered the prospective application of discretionary early release in foreign jurisdictions and the impact this can or ought to have upon the weight to be attached to the public interest in extradition in the cases under consideration.
  • There has been an apparent lack of consensus among High Court judges on this issue, such that a test case has now been granted permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

An interesting aspect of extradition law is the consideration of the legal systems of foreign jurisdictions. This is most frequently done by reference to the dual-criminality test under ss 64 and 65 of the Extradition Act 2003—whereby the conduct for which extradition is sought (either through an accusation or a conviction) must also constitute a crime in England and Wales (‘the conduct test’).

However, other considerations of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll