header-logo header-logo

30 September 2016 / Patrick Gleave , Ashley Groombridge
Issue: 7716 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Stemming the tide

nlj_7716_gleave

The UK legal system must adapt to mitigate the impact of flooding, say Patrick Gleave & Ashley Groombridge

  • Flooding is a serious issue affecting businesses and the lives of millions of people.
  • Reducing the risk and impact of flooding requires landscape scale co-operation between public bodies and multiple landowners.
  • There is a need for easy to establish, long term, adaptable agreements which bind tenants and successive landowners.

Last winter was dominated by the human misery caused by flooding in the Lake District and other parts of Northern England. It’s been only a few short years since the country last suffered from extreme flooding events—the images of train lines hanging freely at Dawlish and the large expanses of water in the Somerset Levels are etched in the memory. The clean-up costs ran to billions. There is an increasing recognition that land management is key to this as described, albeit in strong terms, by George Monboit in The Guardian (“Do little, hide the evidence: the official neglect that caused these deadly floods”, 7 December 2015).

This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll