header-logo header-logo

State immunity—Definition of state—Immigration

02 June 2011
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Regina (HRH Sultan of Pahang) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 616

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, 25 May 2011, Maurice Kay, Smith, Moore-Bick LJJ

The question of the status of a person as a head of state enjoying state immunity is a matter for the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and not for the courts, and accordingly a certificate issued by the Secretary of State under s 21 of the State Immunity Act 1978 is conclusive evidence of the status of a territory for the purposes of Pt I of the Act.

Ian Macdonald QC and Aileen McColgan (instructed by Grange & Castle) for the claimant. Steven Kovats QC (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendant.

The claimant was the sultan of one of nine sultanates making up the Malaysian Federation. At the time of bringing of proceedings, he had not been the supreme head of the Federation for some years. A certificate (the certificate) had been signed by the Director of Protocol at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll