header-logo header-logo

21 July 2017
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-detail

SRA ditches six year run-off

Firms seeking to switch regulator should exercise caution before ditching their six-year run-off cover, a prominent insurance specialist solicitor has advised.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has decided to relax a rule requiring firms to have six years’ professional indemnity insurance cover in place if they change their regulator. Instead, the firm’s new regulator will be solely responsible for ensuring adequate insurance is in place for any future claims.

The SRA is currently working with approved regulators to agree a protocol that sets this out. The approval of the Legal Services Board is still required for the plan to take effect. The SRA has said it hopes to have this by 1 October.

Crispin Passmore, SRA executive director, policy, said: ‘There was overall support for our proposals to remove the obligation for run-off cover if a firm switches regulator.’

However, Frank Maher, partner at Legal Risk solicitors, urged firms ‘to consider carefully before they take advantage of the proposals, because other regulators’ compulsory cover is not as comprehensive as the SRA’s Minimum Terms and Conditions.

‘So, for example, if a firm moves to the Council of Licensed Conveyancers and then hits on hard times and closes in the future, it will no longer have the SRA’s automatic six years’ run-off cover of £2m or £3m per claim plus defence costs, but a single, defence costs-inclusive limit of £2m’.

Maher said: ‘This is by no means academic, as my firm is currently advising partners in firms which have closed who face substantial property-related claims, and there are ex-partners who are having problems replacing run-off cover following the disclaimer of enterprise policies. So, I am not saying “don’t do it”, but they do need to understand the risks fully before making a move from which there may be no turning back.’

Issue: 7755 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll