header-logo header-logo

Square deal or raw deal?

30 November 2012 / Sarah Johnson
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Sarah Johnson concludes that the devil will be in the detail of employee owner contracts

Plans for the creation of a completely new kind of employment arrangement, the employee owner contract, were announced recently by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne.

Consultation on the proposals ended on 8 November 2012. The government aims to provide a response within three months of that date. Rather ominously, the consultation says that the government wishes “to ensure there are no unintended consequences” of the new rules. The plan is to allow companies to use the new contracts from April 2013.

Under employee owner contracts, employees will surrender some of their employment rights in exchange for shares in the business they work for, worth between £2,000 and £50,000.
Employee owner contracts will be available alongside standard employment, worker (including agency worker) or self-employed contracts. The Employment Rights Act 1996 will be amended to create this new kind of employment status.

The government suggests that the new status ensures companies can reduce the risks of employment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll