header-logo header-logo

08 September 2023 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 8039 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Public
printer mail-detail

Spycops: unaccountable & undercover

136440
A light is finally being shone on the murky practices of undercover policing: Jon Robins queries whether the ends ever justified the means

Sir John Mitting published the first findings of his undercover policing inquiry at the end of June, eight years after Theresa May, then home secretary, announced the investigation in the wake of disturbing revelations about the infiltration of Stephen Lawrence’s family’s campaign for justice.

The interim report covers 14 years of covert policing activity by the Metropolitan Police from the end of the 1960s, and shines a light on the murky practices of its Special Demonstration Squad (SDS). It is a strikingly odd read: an historical document capturing the consequences of unchecked state power fuelled by Cold War paranoia, as well as recognition of a changed reality as the violence of the ‘the Troubles’ arrives in Great Britain.

Unjustified means

The SDS ran from 1968 to 2008 and was originally deployed to infiltrate left-wing political and activist groups. Recent concerns have been raised by journalists and activists, including women

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll