header-logo header-logo

Splitting contracts: lessons from Ghent

26 February 2020 / John McMullen
Issue: 7876 / Categories: Features , Employment , TUPE
printer mail-detail
16661
TUPE & multiple transferees: whither the fate of the employment contract? John McMullen reports
  • How does the EU Acquired Rights Directive (and therefore TUPE) apply where the enterprise is split among multiple transferees and the employee works across all parts transferred?
  • Advocate General Szpunar has given his opinion in ISS Facility Services NV v Sonia Govaerts, Euroclean NV, C-344/18, but it is not without its difficulties if adopted by the European Court of Justice.

In ISS Facility Services NV v Sonia Govaerts, Euroclean NV C-344/18, Ms Govaerts was originally employed as a maid by ISS Facility Services. She had three separate part-time work contracts. In September 2004, she signed a new employment contract with ISS. ISS was responsible for cleaning and maintenance of various buildings in the city of Ghent, divided into three lots. The first included museums and historic buildings, the second included libraries and community centres, and the third included administrative buildings. In 2013, Ms Govaerts was promoted to manager of these three sites.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll