header-logo header-logo

Spies, lies & dirty money

20 July 2020
Issue: 7896 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
The long-awaited ‘Russia report’ has called for new legislation to ‘tackle espionage, the illicit financial dealings of the Russian elite and the “enablers” who support this activity’

The Official Secrets Act regime is out of date and ‘not fit for purpose’, according to the 55-page report by the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) into Kremlin influence, simply titled ‘Russia’.

‘Crucially, it is not illegal to be a foreign agent in this country,’ the report states. The outcome of a 2017 Law Commission consultation on a new Espionage Act is ‘still awaited’.

One specific issue an Espionage Act could address is ‘individuals acting on behalf of a foreign power and seeking to obfuscate this link’. The report refers to the US Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), which dates back to the 1930s and requires everyone who represents the interests of a foreign power apart from accredited diplomats to register with the authorities and provide information about activities and finances. There is no UK equivalent.

In evidence to the ISC, the director-general of MI5 said FARA-type legislation would create ‘the basis therefore of being able to pursue under criminal means somebody not declaring, thereby being undercover… today, it is not an offence in any sense to be a covert agent … unless you acquire damaging secrets and give them to your masters’.

While unexplained wealth orders were introduced in January 2018 and can be applied to assets valued at more than £50,000, they ‘may not be that useful in relation to the Russian elite’… moreover, ‘there are practical issues around their use’. The report quotes the director general of the National Crime Agency, ‘Russians have been investing for a long period of time… you can track back and you can see how they will make a case in court that their wealth is not unexplained, it is very clearly explained’.

The report states there are ‘similar concerns in relation to sanctions’.

Issue: 7896 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll