header-logo header-logo

Special Educational Needs (Direct Payments) (Pilot Scheme) Order 2011 (SI 2012/206)

08 February 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Specified local authorities may now pilot making direct payments for special educational provision for children with statements of special educational needs.

Commencement date
30 January 2012

Enabling Power

Education Act 1996, s 532B(1), C(1)


Summary

The pilot scheme allows direct payments to be made to the parent of a beneficiary who has not attained the age of 16 and a beneficiary who has attained the age of 16 and who has capacity to consent to the making of direct payments to them. So a young person aged 16 will be able to manage their own direct payments. Payments may also be made to a nominee or a representative to enable parents or young people (aged over 16) who may not otherwise be able to or wish to do so to have the opportunity of direct payments.

Local authorities must arrange information, advice and other support for families in connection with direct payments. Before making any payments

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll