06 October 2011 / Richard Scorer

Issue: 7484 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury

printer

mail-detail

Spare change?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Skimping on compensation will fuel an increase in litigation & costs says Richard Scorer

According to the BBC (16 September 2011), the government has cut the budget of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA). The CICA is a taxpayer-funded scheme which awards compensation to victims of violent crime. It will have £10m less this year—a cut of 5%. While the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) maintains that the reduced funding will be sufficient, the victim’s organisation, Victim Support, argues that there is already a “financial time bomb” in the scheme.

Sensible policy?

Is cutting the CICA’s budget a sensible policy, even in narrow accountancy terms? Between 1964 and 1 April 1996 the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board (CICB) awarded damages to victims of violent crime on the same basis as the civil courts. In 1995 the then home secretary, Michael Howard, deemed the CICB scheme too expensive and replaced it with the CICA scheme which came into effect on 1 April 1996.

The 1996 scheme was significantly less generous than the scheme it replaced. Whereas

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Spare change?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Skimping on compensation will fuel an increase in litigation & costs says Richard Scorer

According to the BBC (16 September 2011), the government has cut the budget of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA). The CICA is a taxpayer-funded scheme which awards compensation to victims of violent crime. It will have £10m less this year—a cut of 5%. While the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) maintains that the reduced funding will be sufficient, the victim’s organisation, Victim Support, argues that there is already a “financial time bomb” in the scheme.

Sensible policy?

Is cutting the CICA’s budget a sensible policy, even in narrow accountancy terms? Between 1964 and 1 April 1996 the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board (CICB) awarded damages to victims of violent crime on the same basis as the civil courts. In 1995 the then home secretary, Michael Howard, deemed the CICB scheme too expensive and replaced it with the CICA scheme which came into effect on 1 April 1996.

The 1996 scheme was significantly less generous than the scheme it replaced. Whereas

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS

NLJ this week: Tightening the screws on JCT terminations

The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment

NLJ this week: Old rules, fresh warnings in employment law

Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes

NLJ this week: The rise of the ‘ChatGPT client’ rattles the profession

The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself

NLJ this week: Surrogacy children caught in succession gap

A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’

NLJ this week: Online safety law at a crossroads

Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design

back-to-top-scroll