header-logo header-logo

04 June 2009
Issue: 7372 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Southall loses appeal

Professional misconduct

Dr David Southall, the paediatrician whose expert evidence led to the wrongful conviction of solicitor Sally Clark, has lost his appeal against a decision to strike him off the medical register for serious professional misconduct.

In 2004, Southall was found guilty of abusing his professional position by accusing Stephen Clark of murdering his children on the basis of an interview Clark gave in a television documentary. Clark’s wife, Sally, was convicted of murder but cleared on appeal in 2003. She died in 2007.

In 2007, the Fitness to Practise Panel of the General Medical Council found Southall guilty of serious professional misconduct and directed that his name be erased from the register of medical practitioners.

The panel found that Southall had “deep seated attitudinal problems” and that his misconduct was so serious that it was “fundamentally incompatible” with his continuing in medical practice.

Southall appealed, contending that the panel was wrong to make certain findings of fact that were central to the conclusion of serious professional conduct and was wrong to impose erasure, the most severe sanction available.

Delivering judgment in Southall v General Medical Council [2009] EWHC 1155 (Admin), Mr Justice Blake said: “Dr Southall’s conduct was not a mere error of judgment in a challenging environment where there may have been few established principles for guidance. “Nor was this a one-off failure with respect to the treatment of parents whose conduct had come under scrutiny.

Issue: 7372 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll