header-logo header-logo

19 May 2011
Issue: 7466 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Sounding off against budget cuts

Legal aid campaigners have been touring the streets of the Capital in black cabs to gather a unique voicemail petition of public support.

The Sound Off for Justice campaign converted three iconic London taxi cabs into mobile protest vehicles with “sound-off” booths, which were touring zones 1 and 2 for five days this week.

Londoners boarding the cabs were able to leave voicemail messages for Ken Clarke, the justice secretary. Clarke was due to address the House of Lords on the reforms this week, and to appear on the BBC’s Question Time.

The event, backed by actress Joanna Lumley and human rights campaigner Bianca Jagger, aims to raise awareness about the proposed £350m cuts to family and civil law and the impact they will have on ordinary people’s lives.

The specially adapted taxis are equipped with iPhone 4s and iPads, and the campaigners propose alternative reforms that would save more money.

The taxis carried the distinctive Sound Off For Justice logo of Lady Justice armed with a megaphone, and the campaign’s colours of red, black and white. A concierge accompanied the cabs, informing passengers on how to use the electronic equipment and join the online petition.

Jagger said: “What is the purpose of having rights if you can’t enforce the law?”

Linda Lee, president of the Law Society, said: “The Ministry of Justice estimate that if they make these cuts 70,000 Londoners alone will be excluded.

“The taxis are a great way of allowing members of the public to join our campaign and to express their views on the planned cuts. Many people have told me of the difference that legal aid made to their lives and I hope they will share their experiences.”

Issue: 7466 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll