header-logo header-logo

28 October 2011 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Songs of praise

Roger Smith rounds up some recent reviews & awards in the legal world

Lord Judge used a keynote speech at Justice’s annual human rights conference this month to give what he clearly thought was necessary support to Sir Brian Leveson’s inquiry into the press.

Actually, Sir Brian looks as if he is doing rather well on his own. It was predictable that knockabout journalists like Kelvin MacKenzie would seek to intimidate him—as he has. Yet, Sir Brian appears unperturbed. He has handed down a confident 45 paragraph ruling on why he was not going to bend to “red-top” pressure to appoint more assessors from their camp.

More importantly, Sir Brian has made critics of his arrangements look silly by his conduct of the inquiry so far. Judges do appear to be getting to get to grips with inquiry procedure. Lord Hutton was hobbled by his terms of reference but developed the use of a website to publicise evidence. Sir Brian has begun with two days of open discussion that was filmed as it occurred. Papers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll