header-logo header-logo

Solicitors told to steer clear of unregulated claims managers

27 April 2007
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitors dealing with unregulated claims referral companies or claims management companies could face disciplinary sanctions or even prosecution from this week.

Regulation of claims management services—which was brought in by the Compensation Act 2006 and is backed by criminal sanctions—came into force on Monday.

Solicitors have been warned by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to check the status of any claims management company which provides their firm with regulated claims management services.

SRA chair Peter Williamson says: “We expect solicitors to take care that they are only using companies which are properly regulated. These are important measures designed to protect the public from claims farmers who have been using unscrupulous tactics and aggressive selling techniques.”

Claims management companies must comply with new rules of conduct covering advertising, marketing and soliciting of business. For example, clients must be given certain information before they sign a contract and there is a duty to have a complaints procedure.

Mark Boleat, head of claims management regulation at the Department for Constitutional Affairs, says: “We will be closely managing the activities of claims management businesses and will not hesitate to take regulatory action where necessary.”

Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll