header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitors told to steer clear of unregulated claims managers

Solicitors dealing with unregulated claims referral companies or claims management companies could face disciplinary sanctions or even prosecution from this week.

Regulation of claims management services—which was brought in by the Compensation Act 2006 and is backed by criminal sanctions—came into force on Monday.

Solicitors have been warned by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to check the status of any claims management company which provides their firm with regulated claims management services.

SRA chair Peter Williamson says: “We expect solicitors to take care that they are only using companies which are properly regulated. These are important measures designed to protect the public from claims farmers who have been using unscrupulous tactics and aggressive selling techniques.”

Claims management companies must comply with new rules of conduct covering advertising, marketing and soliciting of business. For example, clients must be given certain information before they sign a contract and there is a duty to have a complaints procedure.

Mark Boleat, head of claims management regulation at the Department for Constitutional Affairs, says: “We will be closely managing the activities of claims management businesses and will not hesitate to take regulatory action where necessary.”

Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll