header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitors shun courts and plot legal challenge

News

Criminal solicitors could bring a legal challenge against the Legal Services Commission’s (LSC’s) consultation paper on high cost cases.
Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association (CLSA) chair Ian Kelcey says he does not think the consultation, Very High Cost Case Panel, published last week, is adequate.

“It is not a consultation paper, but the LSC expects the profession to respond on it. This is something we might judicially review, and that line of action will be actively considered,” he says. “Practitioners are feeling used and abused by the government, who hasn’t listened to them, and who consistently ignore what the profession is saying.

“The proposals are now more draconian than Lord Carter’s—he proposed a fund to assist firms in making the changes but the government has withdrawn that from the plans.”

Striking criminal solicitors staged two days of disruptive action across the country last week in protest at reforms to the legal aid system. In south Cumbria, dozens of cases were reportedly adjourned as solicitors stayed away from the courts. The solicitors were protesting against low legal aid fees, as well as the Carter reforms, which will introduce price competitive tendering and drive many firms out of business or force them to merge.
The protest was not organised by the CLSA, although it gave its approval.
A spokesperson for the Department for Constitutional Affairs condemned the strike action. “We are disappointed that a small number of solicitors opted to carry out forms of disruptive action at the end of last week.

“Lord Falconer has previously urged solicitors not to take disruptive action and we strongly believe that by doing so, solicitors are not acting in their clients’ best interests.

“As with previous action this disruption has been limited and not nationwide, in most areas it has been business as usual and we hope the vast majority of lawyers will continue to provide a full service for their clients. Disrupting the criminal justice system and harming the interests of victims, defendants and the court system is unnecessary and irresponsible.”

Andrew Keogh, partner, Tuckers Solicitors, retorts: “Striking per se does not raise any ethical issues. We saw quite widespread action last week but existing client work was still protected, for example, solicitors set up agents’ arrangements at every magistrates’ court in London so there was at least one solicitor there.

“Therefore, the rights of vulnerable people were once again protected by the profession. The courts operated slowly but cases weren’t adjourned so the impact on the public was minimal.”

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll