header-logo header-logo

12 April 2017
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Solicitors prefer costs management to fixed recoverable costs

Costs management has had a negative impact on litigation but it is still preferable to fixed recoverable costs.

That’s the opinion of the majority of personal injury and commercial litigation solicitors at top 200 firms, according to The Costs Management Survey 2017 by Just Costs Solicitors. Some 90% of personal injury solicitors and 78% of commercial litigation solicitors prefer costs management to fixed recoverable costs.

Phil Bradbury, head of costs management at Just Costs, said: “There’s no love or affection for the process, but it’s better the devil you know.” He said the survey results had also thrown up concerns among the majority of respondents about “a lack of consistency in the judicial approach towards costs management”.

“The lack of guidance as to what proportionate costs means and the fact many judges are still unclear on what basis they are supposed to review the parties’ budgets only serves to heighten their concerns,” he said.

The survey highlighted differing views between the 146 personal injury solicitors and 155 commercial litigators participating about their clients’ preferences. Some 65% of the former said their clients would plump for costs management, while 57% of the latter said their clients would prefer fixed costs.

Bradbury said: “Litigators feel their commercial clients would like to know the risk of financial exposure through involvement in a dispute and potential litigation, whether claiming or defending the matter. 

“The knowledge of a fixed fee would provide clarity and reassurance within the litigation and dispute resolution process, enabling them to make a decision about the best way ahead from the outset.”

Lord Justice Jackson, currently reviewing the case for fixed costs, has recommended extending fixed costs to all civil claims, including personal injury cases up to a value of £250,000. Opponents have warned this could stop solicitors taking on complex low-value cases.

See Dominic Regan interview Jackson LJ on the progress of his review in an exclusive NLJ webinar here.

Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll