header-logo header-logo

Solicitors Indemnity Fund given reprieve (for now)

16 June 2021
Issue: 7937 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has announced the extension of the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) for a further year.

The delay means SIF will continue to provide post six-year run-off cover until September 2022 for claims against firms which have closed without a successor practice.

The extension is good news for retired solicitors, some of whom warned the closure of SIF would leave them exposed to the risk of historical claims.

The SRA will now consult on the future of post six-year run-off cover. It warned this week the extension is subject to an affordability test because the fund is deemed beyond the time when a conventional insurance company would have taken steps to bring it to a close.

Anna Bradley, chair of the SRA Board, said: ‘We will need to give careful consideration to finding the right regulatory balance between consumer protection and issues of proportionality, affordability and the wider public interest.’

However, Bradley said she recognised the concerns of the legal profession and the fact the insurance market has hardened, making it more difficult for alternative arrangements to be found.

Post six-year run-off cover is additional to the mandatory six-year run-off cover which the SRA requires firms to have. SIF closed in 2000 when the profession moved to an open market insurance model. It was originally due to close in September 2017, but there have been several extensions since then.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘We have been raising our concerns with the SRA, the regulator for this issue, for more than three years. 

‘We are pleased they are now taking steps to find an effective solution and undertake the detailed analysis required to assess the future of post six-year cover.

‘But it is not enough simply to delay closure again in the hope that next year the commercial indemnity insurance market will change and fill the gap in consumer protection that SIF closure will create. It needs to show imagination in looking at long-term solutions that provide proper levels of consumer protection and do not expose solicitors to ruinous claims or consumers to potentially lengthy and complex litigation.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Ceri Morgan analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Johnson v FirstRand Bank
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
In this month's update, employment guru Ian Smith reveals the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s pivotal role in the ongoing supermarket equal pay litigation, upholding most findings and confirming that detailed training materials are valid evidence of actual work
County court cases are speeding up, with the median time from claim to hearing 62 weeks for fast, intermediate and multi-track claims—5.4 weeks faster than last year
back-to-top-scroll