header-logo header-logo

13 October 2020
Issue: 7906 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitors facing hatred, abuse & threats

Immigration and asylum lawyers targeted for daily online abuse

A law firm has warned its solicitors are receiving daily abuse and threats from members of the public for its legal aid, immigration and asylum work.

Legal aid practice Duncan Lewis issued a lengthy statement this week, calling on the government and sections of the media to stop their anti-lawyer rhetoric ‘which creates hatred not only of immigration and publicly funded lawyers, but of immigrants generally.

‘We are now seeing our lawyers experience abusive behaviour and receive abhorrent and threatening messages online daily for simply trying to do their job and be a voice for the most vulnerable: victims of torture, victims of trafficking and unaccompanied asylum-seeking children. This has to stop.

‘Please be assured that we do not deal with cases we think have no merit…If a lawyer pursues unjustifiable “endless legal claims” as [Home Secretary] Priti Patel alleges, they are not paid.’

It was reported last week that a violent knife attack took place at a law firm in September. For security reasons, the firm has not been identified.

The escalating rhetoric prompted Bar Council Chair, Amanda Pinto QC to write to the prime minister to demand an apology. Both the PM and the Home Secretary made derogatory comments about ‘lefty lawyers’ in their speeches at Conservative Party Conference last week.

Pinto said: ‘There should never be a situation when a British Prime Minister, Home Secretary and other government ministers need to be called upon to stop deliberately inflammatory language towards a profession simply doing its job in the public interest.

‘Shockingly, we've arrived at that point. Even if it was never the intention of this government to incite violence against members of the legal profession, the fact the personal safety of lawyers is now at risk demands an immediate retraction of the ill-judged comments made in recent weeks by the Prime Minister and the Home Secretary, as well as a public apology.’

 

Issue: 7906 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll