header-logo header-logo

22 October 2025
Issue: 8136 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Legal services , Consumer , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail

Solicitors’ regulator sanctioned for failures

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) must overhaul its complaints and risk assessment processes to fix ‘systemic shortcomings’, the Legal Services Consumer Panel has said

The panel called for ‘clear safeguards’ for clients involved in ‘high-risk legal arrangements, including litigation funding’ this week, in its response to Legal Services Board (LSB) moves to sanction the SRA for failing to protect thousands of clients affected by the collapse of law firm SSB Group.

An LSB-commissioned independent review by Northern Ireland firm Carson McDowell, published last week, found the SRA did not act effectively or efficiently in the five years leading to the collapse of the Sheffield firm despite receiving more than 100 reports.

It found the SRA did not take all the steps it could have taken, which meant it failed adequately to protect consumers, the public interest and professional standards.

The LSB will impose two sanctions on the SRA—a public censure and performance targets and monitoring.

SSB Group, which acted for thousands of clients in high-volume civil litigation claims, mainly relating to cavity wall insulation, went into administration in January 2024 owing £200m to litigation funders and other creditors. Many of its clients were subsequently pursued for adverse legal costs, despite having been assured their claims were ‘no win no fee’.

Catherine Brown, interim chair of the LSB, said: ‘The former clients of SSB have suffered profound emotional and financial harm.’

Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘The report lays bare a lack of leadership and oversight of regulatory procedures and processes at the SRA.

‘This is despite knowing the risks posed by bulk cavity wall insulation cases, the previous failure of Pure Legal from which the SRA transferred clients to SSB, and multiple reports from MPs, other lawyers, industry and the victims themselves. A key concern must be the treatment of vulnerable victims by the SRA.

‘This cannot just be about improving systems and processes but requires culture change and focused leadership.’

Anna Bradley, chair of the SRA, said: ‘We are sorry that we did not act more quickly in relation to SSB… We fully accept the recommendations of this review.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll