header-logo header-logo

A social panacea?

09 April 2009 / Finola Moss
Issue: 7364 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Finola Moss asks whether the Adoption Act 2002 is a step too far

* * * * * *

The Adoption Act 1926 was a response to a pressing social need for child protection and the formalisation of adoption. Legislation introducing the concept of transplanting a child for ever into a new family had been stalled for a long time, because of the abhorrence of the common law to the alienation of a parent's right to their children. An adoption still required a mentally competent parent's consent. Fifty years later, the Adoption Act 1976 allowed an adoption if such consent was being unreasonably withheld.

The Adoption and Children Act 2002 (ACA 2002) would provide expeditious adoptions for children in care with forever families. It placed a child's needs at the centre of the adoption process, aligning adoption law with the welfare principle in the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), dispensing with a parent's consent if thought necessary in the child's welfare. The once hallowed, inalienable common law right became silently subsumed and overridden

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll