header-logo header-logo

Smart fridge safety under review

17 March 2021
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Legal News , Technology
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have been asked for their views on product safety laws, as ministers prepare for a legislative overhaul.

Business minister Paul Scully said last week the review will take account of the rise in online shopping and how recent technologies such as smart fridges, smart watches, artificial intelligence and 3D printing are making product safety more complex.

Other issues to explore, Scully said, include ensuring product safety reflects everyone in society, since there have been examples of voice recognition that responds less well to female voices and facial recognition technologies less able to recognise certain skin tones.

The government is looking for views on considerations when enforcing the legislation and on creating an inclusive product safety framework, among other matters. Responses should be submitted by 3 June here.

Issue: 7925 / Categories: Legal News , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Ceri Morgan analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Johnson v FirstRand Bank
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
In this month's update, employment guru Ian Smith reveals the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s pivotal role in the ongoing supermarket equal pay litigation, upholding most findings and confirming that detailed training materials are valid evidence of actual work
County court cases are speeding up, with the median time from claim to hearing 62 weeks for fast, intermediate and multi-track claims—5.4 weeks faster than last year
back-to-top-scroll