header-logo header-logo

26 July 2012
Issue: 7524 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Small firms in decline

Fall in number of sole practitioners

Banks’ reluctance to lend to law firms is contributing to a decline in the number of sole practitioners, according to funding provider Syscap.

In March 2012, there were 3,574 single-partner firms, compared with 3,692 in the year before, and the number has decreased by 17% in the last five years. The number of law firms has increased slightly to just over 11,000 in the same period.

Philip White, CEO of Syscap, says: “Small law firms are being told by their banks that they need to merge if they want the continuing support of their lender.

“It seems that some lenders are also predicting a very pessimistic future for high-street law firms as a result of the entry of new competitors like the Co-op. While many high-street law firms could really do with investing in IT and marketing to deal with this new competition, they are going to find it a real struggle to get approval for these loans from their traditional banks.

“Most banks are very reluctant to lend money to businesses to acquire IT—which is a bit strange as IT is a real boost to productivity and in many cases can provide a competitive advantage.”

White predicted that some law firms may look to borrow to pay their semi-annual tax payments at the end of this month. Syscap recorded a 17% jump in the number of funding requests from law firms specifically to pay their 31 January tax bills this year.

Issue: 7524 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll