header-logo header-logo

11 December 2015 / Kim Harrison , Richard Scorer
Issue: 7680 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Slave to the system

nlj_7680_scorer

Richard Scorer & Kim Harrison explain why anti-slavery legislation needs sharper teeth

It would be nice to think that slavery is a thing of the past but it is not. If slavery is defined to include “slavery, servitude, forced or compulsory labour, human trafficking and exploitation; including the sexual exploitation of both adults and children” (its definition within the Modern Slavery Act 2015 (MSA 2015)) then there are thousands of slaves in the UK—around 13,000 according to the Home Office. It will only be defeated if its victims can hold the perpetrators to account in the courts. But are the legal remedies for modern slavery—particularly civil remedies—as effective as they need to be?

An obvious starting point for legal accountability is the Human Rights Act 1998, which expressly prohibits slavery in Art 4, but this needs to be underpinned by practical enforcement measures. Hence the introduction of MSA 2015, which consolidates and simplifies existing human trafficking and slavery offences and also increases the maximum sentence for slavery and human trafficking to life

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll