header-logo header-logo

01 March 2016
Issue: 7690 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Sir Nicholas Forwood QC—White & Case LLP

sir_nicholas_forwood

Former EU judge joins Brussels office

Sir Nicholas Forwood QC, formerly a judge of the General Court of the EU, has joined White & Case LLP in Brussels.

Sir Nicholas joins the firm as Counsel on a part-time basis. He was a judge of the General Court (formerly the EC Court of First Instance) from 1999 to 2015, prior to which he spent 20 years as a leading barrister at the competition law Bar in London and Brussels. His experience covers all fields of EU law, including cartels, abuse of dominant position and state aids, EU sanctions and IP.

Sir Nicholas was called to the English Bar in 1970 and to the Irish Bar in 1981. Appointed Queen's Counsel in 1987 he was made Knight Bachelor in December 2015 for services to European justice.

“Sir Nicholas has long been regarded as one of Europe's most influential competition lawyers,” says White & Case partner and global head of antitrust, Mark Gidley. “His knowledge and extensive experience will be a valuable asset and enhance the advice we provide our international clients on EU and competition law matters.”

Mark Powell, head of the EMEA competition section, says: “We’re extremely pleased that Sir Nicholas has chosen to join our team and resume his private practice in Brussels. Sir Nicholas will help reinforce our strength in competition litigation in Luxembourg and London, as well as support our clients on a broad range of EU law questions.”

Issue: 7690 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll