header-logo header-logo

31 July 2019
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-detail

Singapore mediation treaty puts cross-border enforcement on the table

Ministers and senior officials from more than 50 countries will gather in Singapore next week to support a new international treaty on mediation.

The United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation, also known as the Singapore Convention on Mediation, will provide for the cross-border enforcement of mediated settlement agreements. Intended signatories include the USA and China. However, EU member states will not be included, as the EU has not yet determined whether it can sign as one entity or whether all 28 members must sign individually.

According to the Singapore Ministry of Law, ‘mediation is rising in popularity as a means to resolve cross-border commercial disputes.

‘However, its growth has been hindered by a long-standing obstacle―the difficulty that a party faces in ensuring that the other party complies with their mediated settlement.’ This is because a mediation agreement is only binding contractually rather than being directly enforceable by the courts.

The ministry said: ‘The Convention therefore addresses the lack of an effective means to enforce cross-border commercial mediated settlement agreements.

‘Businesses can have greater assurance that mediation can be relied on to settle cross-border commercial disputes, because mediated settlement agreements can be enforced more readily by the courts of contracting parties to the Convention and may also be invoked by a party as a defence against a claim. This will facilitate the growth of international commerce and promote the use of mediation around the world.’

More than 1,500 lawyers are expected to attend the signing ceremony on 7 August and the week-long Singapore Convention conference, which will include sessions on dispute resolution, mediation, negotiation and infrastructure development.

Singapore is a major player in global dispute resolution, benefits from considerable government investment, and boasts an International Arbitration Centre and the Singapore International Commercial Court. 

For more information, see CEDR Managing Director James South's article for NLJ, 'Working better together'.

Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll