header-logo header-logo

07 August 2013 / Lawrence McNamara
Issue: 7572 / Categories: Opinion , Bribery , Profession
printer mail-detail

A sign of the times...or an aberration?

Lawrence McNamara & Celia Rooney on corruption in the UK justice system

Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer reported this month that 24% of people in the UK believe the courts and judiciary are corrupt or extremely corrupt, and that 20% of people who used the courts in 2012 said they or a household member had paid a bribe in relation to that.
 

These findings have had little attention. They even went unmentioned by the co-chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Anti-Corruption.
Yet, they seem remarkable. Can they really be correct? What are we to make of them?

Temperature gauge

The Barometer is derived from surveys of 1,000 people in each of 107 countries about their perception and experience of corruption in a dozen institutional categories including “Judiciary (courts)”.
 
First, perception. While 24% think the courts and judiciary are affected by corruption, this is not out of kilter with common law countries such as Australia (28%), Canada (25%), or New Zealand (20%). Still, it is up from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll