header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Wills & Probate , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Siblings lose inheritance tax battle

News

Two elderly sisters have lost their European Court of Human Rights’ appeal against inheritance tax liability.

Joyce and Sybil Burden— both in their 80s—have shared the house they inherited from their father for 30 years. They appealed to the Grand Chamber to overturn the ruling of the lower court that they should be liable for inheritance tax when one dies. The unmarried sisters claimed they were victims of discrimination since they are prevented by law from entering into a civil partnership and thus cannot take advantage of the exemption to paying any inheritance tax on the first death.

However, the Grand Chamber found by a 15-2 majority that because the sisters’ relationship was of a different nature to that of married couples and homosexual partners they had not suffered discrimination. Julian Washington, a partner at Forsters LLP, says there will be sighs of relief at the Treasury. “The Grand Chamber decided the UK government was entitled to give preferential tax treatment to spouses (and now same sex civil partners). The relationship of the two sisters was quite different: they had chosen to cohabit as siblings but they did not fall into the privileged categories which the UK was entitled to recognise,” he says.

Issue: 7319 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Wills & Probate , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll