header-logo header-logo

Without prejudice: Shedding new light

16 September 2020 / Bryan Clark
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Features , ADR , Mediation , Profession
printer mail-detail
27520
Bryan Clark sets the record straight on recent developments in without prejudice rules in mediation
  • Berkeley Square Holdings and others v Lancer Property Asset Management Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 1015 (Ch): shedding significant new light on some of the exceptions to the without prejudice rule.


Confidentiality is one of the most vaunted attributes of mediation. One important benefit of this is the ability of parties to speak freely in their negotiation safe in the knowledge that what happens in the mediation, stays in the mediation. In particular, mediators often assure parties that matters disclosed by parties in the heat of the battle cannot be led in evidence in any consequent litigation. But the issue is not so clear cut. There is no absolute bar on evidential disclosure as to what took place in the mediation. No special mediation privilege exists in England and Wales and no bespoke statutory provisions governing confidentiality in mediation exist (except in EU cross border matters under the Cross Border Mediation (EU Directive)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll