header-logo header-logo

Shareholders say no

15 September 2011 / Eleanor Kelly
Issue: 7481 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Eleanor Kelly charts the rise of opposition to directors’ remuneration

Many company directors will have noted with a mixture of interest and trepidation the increase in the level of discontent over the issue of directors’ remuneration at many listed company annual general meetings this year.

PIRC report

The rise in shareholder opposition to directors’ pay was highlighted in a report published by shareholder advisory group Pensions Investment Research Consultants Ltd (PIRC) on voting trends across 287 companies in the first six months of 2011.

This revealed that in the year to the end of June 2011, the average vote against the directors’ remuneration report was 6.1%, and average abstentions were 3.14%. This reflects a 0.5% rise in opposition compared to the first six months of 2010 and a 2.8% rise since 2008. PIRC also reported that in 2008, 82.6% of reports were approved with less than 5% of shareholders voting against the resolution, compared to only 66% this year.

Cable & Wireless

One of most publicised cases of shareholder revolt against directors’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll