header-logo header-logo

12 June 2019
Issue: 7844 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Sex offences on the rise

Internet companies should bear more responsibility in stopping online sexual offences, law reform and human rights group JUSTICE has said

In a working party report, ‘Prosecuting Sexual Offences’, published this week, the organisation makes 57 recommendations for reform across investigations, prosecution and sentencing. They include a legal requirement that internet companies report to Companies House what they are doing to stop sexual offences taking place on their platforms, and that company directors who fail to do this be held criminally liable.

To make court cases more efficient, JUSTICE recommends there be a dedicated hearing to assess the needs of complainants giving evidence and that pre-recorded evidence be made available for all sexual offence cases. Stronger safeguards should be in place to protect complainants and vulnerable witnesses, and the Judicial College and the Inns of Court College of Advocacy should consider joint training on this issue. Police video recorded interviews should be tailored to the needs of vulnerable witnesses in terms of location, questioning and structure, to improve the quality of their evidence.

Recent years have seen an increase in sexual offence allegations due to online offences, a rise in reporting, shifting cultural attitudes and the uncovering of non-recent crimes.

Andrea Coomber, director of JUSTICE, said: ‘At a time where sexual offence allegations are putting the criminal justice system under increased strain and causing distress to victims, it is particularly important to not only ensure that procedures are efficient but also to identify ways to stop sexual offending occurring in the first place.

‘This report highlights the need for a holistic approach to sexual offences that encompasses education, prevention and effective rehabilitation.’

Peter Rook QC, chair of the working party, said there was ‘substantial scope for alleviating the pressures upon the criminal justice system’.

Issue: 7844 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll