header-logo header-logo

Settled or not?

05 March 2020
Issue: 7877 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
16963
District Judge Corkill advocates the need to choose the correct method of settlement
  • Notices of discontinuance: filing, serving and specifying.
  • Consent orders: agreed terms and enforcement.
  • Tomlin orders: applications and common errors.

‘Dear Judge…this claim has settled please vacate the hearing…’. Such letters are frequently seen in our box work from solicitors particularly on claims allocated to the small claims track. Is such a letter sufficient to conclude a claim? On reading the CPR this is not one of the methods by which a claim can be concluded.

Whether a claim is allocated to the small, fast or multi-track, when a settlement has been negotiated the parties should consider which of the methods prescribed by the CPR to use. The following is a summary of the most common methods used but before choosing one of them do familiarise yourself with the relevant rule, requirements and consequences.

To be effective, the notice must be filed, served on every party, if there is more than one defendant it must specify against which of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll