header-logo header-logo

Separation of church & state

18 July 2025 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Features , International , Constitutional law , Human rights
printer mail-detail
225826
How has a phrase that appears nowhere in the supreme law of the US managed to become part of it? Athelstane Aamodt considers the history

Of all of the phrases connected with the Constitution of the United States, the only phrase more famous than ‘the right of the people to keep and bear Arms’ must be ‘separation of church and state’. It has informed debates about the Establishment Clause found in the First Amendment for years. The American Constitution is also clear that ‘no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States’ (Article VI, Clause 3).

This all seems clear. Religion has no role to play in government in America. However, it becomes rather less clear when you realise that the phrase ‘separation of church and state’ does not appear anywhere in the Constitution at all. How, then, has a phrase that forms no part of the supreme law of the US managed to become part of it?

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll