header-logo header-logo

Sentencing Council issues mental health guidelines for judges

10 April 2019
Issue: 7836 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Criminal
printer mail-detail

For the first time, judges and magistrates are to be given guidelines to help them assess responsibility when sentencing offenders with mental health conditions.

Draft guidance published this week by the Sentencing Council aims to provide a process to follow when sentencing people with mental health conditions or conditions such as learning disabilities, autism, brain injury, substance misuse disorders and dementia.

Lucy Schonegevel, head of health influencing at Rethink Mental Illness, said: ‘This is a big step towards the justice system having a better understanding of mental illness, as it’s the first time there will be specific sentencing guidelines in this area.’

There is a lack of reliable data on mental illness in prisons. According to a 2017 National Audit Office report, however, one survey of recent arrivals at prison found nearly a quarter had prior contact with mental health services; 17% of the prison population is thought to have a learning disability compared to 2% of the population; the proportion of prisoners with autism is believed to be double that within the general population; and nearly a quarter of prisoners have been hospitalised for a head injury.

The guidance takes the form of principles to be applied by judges alongside offence-specific guidelines. The principles include that the courts: focus on individual circumstances; balance the rights and needs of offenders with the protection of the public and rights and needs of victims and their families to feel safe; and consider all the facts in each case, including what is practically available.

Sentencing Council member Judge Rosa Dean said the council believed ‘offenders who have a mental health condition or disorder, neurological impairment or developmental disorder should be confident that the court has the information it needs to take a consistent approach’.

The Sentencing Council consultation, ‘Overarching Principles: Sentencing Offenders with Mental Health Conditions or Disorders’, ends on 9 July 2019 .

Issue: 7836 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll